Q Read the Starbucks case study Links to an external site.. This case study uses Porter's Value Chain and Five Forces models and a SWOT (strengths-weaknesses-opportunities) analysis to develop strategic recommendations. On page 7 of the Starbucks case study there are 10 recommendations. Choose 3 of the recommendations and identify how IT could be used as part of the implementation of that recommendation. Research in the library how other companies have done something similar for each of your 3 recommendations. Your paper should be at least 3 pages, not counting the title and reference pages. The paper must include at least 3 references from peer-reviewed articles in academic journals. Make sure you have in-text citations and a reference page. You can include additional references from websites and books. Rubric COT GRAD Paper Rubric COT GRAD Paper Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Purpose 25 to >23.0 pts Work stands out as exemplary, is accurately detailed, and reflects the assignment purpose. Paper provides an in-depth, clear, and concise description of the topic. 23 to >21.0 pts Work is accurately detailed and reflects the assignment purpose. Paper provides a clear and concise description of the topic. 21 to >18.0 pts Work mostly reflects the assignment purpose. Paper provides adequate support to the topic. 18 to >17.0 pts Work marginally reflects the assignment purpose. Paper provides only basic support to the topic. 17 to >0 pts Work does not reflect the assignment purpose. Paper does not address or minimally addresses topic. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking 25 to >23.0 pts Integrates ideas from several sources and through critical analysis applies the ideas in a new context. Draws compelling new insights based upon the research. 23 to >21.0 pts Integrates ideas from several sources with some evidence of critical analysis to provide new insight(s). 21 to >18.0 pts Uses ideas from multiple sources with some integration. Some critical thinking, but minimal new insights. 18 to >17.0 pts Uses ideas from multiple sources, but the ideas are disjointed and there is little evidence of critical thinking. 17 to >0 pts Reiterates ideas from limited sources. No evidence of critical thinking. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Support 20 to >18.7 pts Uses more than required number of scholarly/professional references to support research with excellent, clear, and concise integration 18.7 to >17.4 pts Uses more than required number of scholarly/professional references to support research with good integration 17.4 to >16.1 pts Uses required number of scholarly/professional references to support research with good integration 16.1 to >14.8 pts Uses required number of scholarly/professional references to support research with poor integration 14.8 to >0 pts Ineffective support and/or documentation of research 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Style 10 to >9.4 pts Well developed paragraphs. Sequencing enhances ideas and meaning. Ideas focused on central theme. 9.4 to >8.7 pts Individual paragraphs are good. Good flow between paragraphs with adequate structure and sequencing of ideas. 8.7 to >8.0 pts Paragraphs are adequate, but sequencing and flow between paragraphs is not always logical. 8 to >7.3 pts Poor sentence sequence within paragraphs making it difficult to understand the intent of the paragraph. Poor flow between paragraphs. 7.3 to >0 pts Ideas not in logical order. No structure to paragraphs. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling, Grammar, Punctuation 10 to >9.4 pts No spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors are readily apparent 9.4 to >8.7 pts Paper contains 1 or 2 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors 8.7 to >8.0 pts Paper contains 3 or 4 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors 8 to >7.3 pts Paper contains 5 or 6 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors 7.3 to >0 pts Paper is riddled with spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style/Formatting 10 to >9.4 pts No APA errors are readily apparent 9.4 to >8.7 pts Paper contains 1 or 2 different APA errors regarding formatting, citations, and/or references 8.7 to >8.0 pts Paper contains 3 or 4 different APA errors regarding formatting, citations, and/or references 8 to >7.3 pts Paper contains 5 or 6 different APA errors regarding formatting, citations, and/or references 7.3 to >0 pts Paper is riddled with APA errors 10 pts Total Points: 100